Manual testing is a process of testing software manually, usually by a human tester. This type of testing is usually done to find bugs or defects in the software. Automation testing is a process of testing software using automation tools. This type of testing is usually done to find bugs or defects in the software faster and more efficiently.
Other related questions:
Why manual testing is important over automation testing?
Manual testing is important because it allows testers to find bugs that may not be found by automation testing. Automation testing can find bugs that are reproducible and that follow a certain pattern, but it may miss bugs that are not reproducible or that do not follow a pattern. Manual testing allows testers to use their own judgment and experience to find these types of bugs.
How can we improve the efficiency of automation testing?
There are many ways to improve the efficiency of automation testing. Some ways include using a tool that can automate the testing process, using a framework that can help with the organization and execution of tests, and using techniques such as test-driven development and continuous integration.
How can manual testing be more efficient?
There are a number of ways to make manual testing more efficient:
1. Use checklists to ensure that all necessary tests are carried out.
2. Automate repetitive tests.
3. Use test management tools to keep track of tests and their results.
4. Prioritize tests according to business criticality.
5. Focus on high-value tests that have the potential to find the most defects.
Is it better to do automation testing rather doing manual testing?
There is no simple answer to this question as it depends on a number of factors, including the type of application under test, the skills of the testers, and the resources available. In general, automation can be more efficient and effective for regression testing, while manual testing may be more appropriate for exploratory testing or for testing complex applications.